A method for evaluating the economic benefit of sediment control in irrigation systems
The report describes how to determine the economic benefits of introducing sediment control structures at schemes where desilting costs are unacceptably large, or where sedimentation reduces the areas that can be easily irrigated An application of the procedure on an irrigation system in the Philippines is described.
Background
Maintenance budgets in many run of river irrigation schemes are dominated by the costs of removing sediment from canals. The problem results from the limited sediment transporting capacity of most canal networks, and occurs when water is diverted from rivers carrying high sediment loads. Sediment deposition results in rising canal bed levels, reduced canal capacities, and problems in supplying the required amounts of water to some or all parts of the irrigated area.

These problems can be reduced or eliminated by constructing sediment control structures. Such structures reduce the quantities of sediment entering irrigation systems by excluding sediment at river intakes, or extracting it from canal flows. Subsequent reductions in the amount of desilting required, lower the costs of sediment removal. Improvements in the reliability of water supply to downstream parts of irrigation systems enable the irrigated area to be maintained.

The report
The report describes the development and application of a method of evaluating the economic benefits of sediment control measures, utilising data that is typically available in developing countries.

What it covers

The first section of the report summarises the method for evaluating the economic benefits of sediment control. The method uses conventional cost benefit calculations, incorporating in the "without project" scenario the estimated costs of the future loss of

  productive potential due to sedimentation. "With project" costs are calculated on the basis that sustaining an acceptable irrigation service to the scheduled area, and reducing desilting costs are primary objectives.

The second section of the report describes a verification of the evaluation procedure at the Agno River Irrigation System in the Philippines. Sediment control facilities consisting of a vortex tube sediment extractor and low level sluicing gates were constructed at the head of the main canal. Actual performance was then monitored and results compared with predictions made from use of the evaluation procedure.

The report concludes that low cost sediment control structures, such as the one studied, will pay for themselves in a few years through reductions in desilting costs.

Contributors
HR Wallingford Ltd, UK; National Irrigation Administration, Philippines.

Intended users
The information is intended for use by irrigation system designers and technical planners.


Chancellor, F; Lawrence, P and Atkinson, E, 1996. A method for evaluating the economic benefit of sediment control in irrigation systems. HR Wallingford, UK. Report no. OD/TN 81.

Click here for full document


Available at: http://www.dfid-kar-water.net/w5outputs.html
For a CD ROM or a hard copy contact:
International Development Group, HR Wallingford Ltd, Howbery Park, Oxon, OX10 8BA, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1491 835381, Fax: +44 (0) 1491 826352, E-mail: w5outputs@hrwallingford.co.uk